![]() I hate advertising in general, but with the above, I would call it acceptable for the time being I haven't even bothered with the YouTube ad segment skip plugins/scripts for such items. With native advertising articles, it's fairly fast to recognize that there's no real information in an article and to just skip it if the authors still get paid and the advertisers are satisfied with the screen time, then so be it, I'm ultimately not too annoyed by such a situation as I don't get interrupted by ads. It's not interrupting the actual videos typically, the advertisers get their precious views and tracking, and the creators get paid. Unfortunately, ad blocking in the YouTube app is technically impossible, but If you watch YouTube in Safari, there is a way. ![]() It's still annoying, but it's not the immediately disruptive experience that more traditional web advertising are, and with YouTube at least, it seems many of the creators have settled on having predictable timing for their ad segment, either right after their intro or right at the end, and I think this is a healthy way of handling it. If it stays at the level where the most you get is 30 seconds of a YouTube video dedicated to ads and occasional ad-only articles, in my opinion it's fine. More than 70 million people have already chosen AdGuard. Native Advertising seems to be at this stage fairly tame, but I don't hold any belief that it can't/won't change. AdGuard is a company with over 12 years of experience in ad blocking and privacy protection mostly known for AdGuard ad blocker, AdGuard VPN, and AdGuard DNS. ![]() Not exactly this is a bit of semantics, but "Native Advertising" is different than traditional advertising, and Native Advertising might be _an_ answer to ad-blocking, but it's by no means _the_ answer.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |